Sep 20, 2007 @ 11:59am

they could have at least used sasha this time.jpg

Comments

avatar

posted by ani

Sep 20, 2007 2:12PM

Nothing against Gemma, but why do they need to sandwhich her between "local models"?

avatar

posted by

Sep 20, 2007 3:50PM

trop marrant

avatar

posted by Rebe

Sep 20, 2007 4:06PM

It looks hyper airbrushed, especially in comparison to the pictured Vogue China.

avatar

posted by

Sep 20, 2007 6:05PM

i like how they airbrushed/styled gemma to highlight the ways she looks like the other models -- rounder face for vogue china, longer for india

avatar

posted by anon

Sep 20, 2007 6:47PM

those are not "local models," but rather bollywood actresses. preity zinta and priyanka chopra look gorgeous and better than gemma!

avatar

posted by gerald

Sep 20, 2007 9:50PM

^um. only not

avatar

posted by Jacky C.

Sep 21, 2007 5:30AM

HAHAHA, WTF?! This is too funny.

avatar

posted by softy

Sep 21, 2007 12:24PM

my thoughts exactly, gerald.

avatar

posted by Cindy

Sep 21, 2007 4:20PM

well, let's not get into what each race thinks is beautiful. they all look air-brushed but beautiful nonetheless.

avatar

posted by K

Sep 22, 2007 4:07PM

Gemma is less than impressive on both covers. She's being a bit upstaged by the other girls. What's the point in putting her there anyway?

avatar

posted by J

Sep 24, 2007 12:42PM

they've made gemma look like a blonde Indian on one cover and a blonde Chinese woman on the other... look at how they've played with her eyes..... ugh.. i dont like the vogue india cover at all, it's boring.

avatar

posted by Kate

Sep 24, 2007 1:48PM

I think that's Caroline on the Vogue India cover, no?

Post Your Comment