The Times Questions Bag Hags, Then Becomes One

Oct 15, 2007 @ 12:01pm

chanello.jpg
We were riveted by Deborah Solomon's weekend movie on The New York Times.

Called "The Power of the Purse," it features the prominent writer outside of Prada and Armani. She questions the value of a designer bag, and wonders how an accessory "can cost more than a car" - beneath the Chanel window, she muses, "Will a Chanel bag get you into heaven?"

The brief film interviews consumers about their bags, and puts forth an intriguing hypothesis:

"Why are handbags so large?... Because it makes it that much easier for us to see them... [unlike a car or a house on the Hamptons], a bag, you can take it and show it off at all times."

The movie is cool, and so is Deborah Solomon, but there's one part we didn't love:

She spends an awful lot of time huffing about the ridiculous price of a handbag, even asking women if they feel guilty about their arm candy. But then she shows us her own - an Orla Kiely tote.

It doesn't cost the same as a Birkin, but the last time we checked, Orla Kiely's overhyped, overwaxed prints cost almost $600 - and just like an Indy bag, you can spot them from the top floor of a Park Avenue high rise.

Since we got our Stam on sale for $500, which is less than the average Orla price, we have to ask Ms. Solomon:

Aren't you just as guilty of bag indulgence? And why couldn't you discuss that in your video?

Comments

avatar

posted by foX

Oct 15, 2007 1:12PM

stam on sale? WHEN? HOW!?

avatar

posted by jesspgh

Oct 15, 2007 1:51PM

To be fair, that orla kiely style is probably closer to $200 or less, at retail price. Her leather bags are the $600 ones.

Interesting video, though. Even though I have expensive bags and do not yet own a home, I agree with the gentleman who said the priorities of that aren't appropriate.

avatar

posted by tasteblog

Oct 15, 2007 2:15PM

you still carry a stam? on the streets? of new york?

avatar

posted by Janie

Oct 15, 2007 2:33PM

ACK! DEBORAH SOLOMON--that bag is as awful as she is!

avatar

posted by Martine

Oct 15, 2007 3:24PM

This is possibly the worst fashion-related video the Times has ever posted. It was so weak and Deborah Solomon was completely ignorant. It made me want to scream!

avatar

posted by Kris

Oct 15, 2007 3:34PM

How do you know she didn't get her Orla on sale like you got your Stam on sale? THen it'd be cheaper than yours.

avatar

posted by leia

Oct 15, 2007 3:48PM

@ tasteblog:
The Stam is a classic bag......

avatar

posted by tasteblog

Oct 15, 2007 4:32PM

@lela

the stam bag is completely trend driven. no different than last season's prada fringe bag. the quilting and vintage-y shape has already been copied at urban outfitters. No one I know would be caught dead with it. not even Stam herself.

avatar

posted by

Oct 15, 2007 8:57PM

i think on sale for $500 is code for $40 Chinatown knockoff.

avatar

posted by kim

Oct 16, 2007 9:21AM

oh tasteblog,

does it really matter that YOU don't know anyone who would be caught dead with the stam? is that going to change anyone's favorable opinion of the bag? no. and i would certainly hope no one here is inflicted with such a weak mind that they would alter their preferences simply to satisfy you even if you do sound so resolute.

i very much like my stam and i would still wear it even if anna wintour lights it on fire, pays testino to photograph it, and puts it on vogue's december '07 cover. then again, i'm the type of person who wears what i want even if some editor-in-chief of some glossy fashion magazine decided it was SOO last season. imagine that! oh, you can't? that's a shame.

avatar

posted by rachel

Oct 16, 2007 11:35AM

lol kim you go girl

avatar

posted by Laia

Oct 16, 2007 11:44AM

kim:
that sounds like the coolest vogue cover that'll never happen. especially if jessica herself is seen in the background lighting it on fire and dancing around like a witch. hahaha.
A++++

Post Your Comment